Prophet 6 vs rev2 reddit. Prophet Rev 2 destroys it in every way.
Prophet 6 vs rev2 reddit Is this True? Because if the rev2-16 has more Power im willing to pay 500 Prophet 5/10 rev 4 addresses all sonic failings of the others, stunning VCOs, amazing filters (2 flavours) and convincing pure analog tone. They sounded a bit muddy or dirty. EDIT Trigon 6 is best! A class above the other 2 6's (have owned them all) LMAO. ly/Rev2_ResSamples*Support my channel (at no extra cost) and get your own Sequential synths with the Perfect Circuit a Hydrasynth vs Prophet Rev2 Does anyone have an opinion about the ASM Hydrasynth vs the DSI Prophet Rev2 in terms of pads, bass sounds and leads? I'm thinking about buying on of them and I'm curious if someone can share their experience. The rev 2 had a lot more features, which is not subjective. Feb 1, 2020 · Even though the P6 has only six voices, the Rev. I know that you can only Play 8 notes at once with the rev2-8 but i also heard that it has less power and „crisp“ to it. Synth The Prophet 6 is better than the Prophet 5/10. The rev 2 is likely much more approachable from the viewpoint, but even that is a LOT of synth. Do you know your way around subtractive synthesis pretty well? The Rev 2 is classically analog, warm, chunky, and will get you all the bread and butter sounds you might expect out of an "analog" synth. Look up “Prophet Rev 2 Voice Component Modeling. I've had more fun twiddling with the OB-6 than the Prophet 08. I wanted a Prophet 5 since I was a teenager, but once I got the Prophet 08, it just didn't click with me and was rather underwhelming. I want a Pro3, but a Take5 will fit better on my side-table if I have to choose between those 2 next year (vs something else I like even more). I own a Polybrute, an OB-6, and a Matriarch, but if I make another big synth purchase at some point, it will probably be a Super 6 desktop. While I haven't played one in person yet, I'm not enjoying the sound of the Take 5 demos I'm hearing. Now, the character of the sound matters a lot. I have a Prophet 6, Prophet 12 module, and Pro 2. Yes I've owned the Rev 2. Also any modern sounds for trance/dance just didnt' sit right with me. The rev 2 and the peak really are very comparable. I'm enjoying the prophet 6 now, but kinda lusting over the P10. for me the OB-6 is one of the best sounding synths of all time, not just modern but ALL TIME. Prophet Rev 2 destroys it in every way. I recently played a prophet 5, a rev2, a take 5, and a prophet 6 together in a store. I think there's just enough difference between the three for me to keep all of them. I didn't ever really like the general tone of the P6. I've had A rev 2 and now own a Prophet 10 Rev 4. I cant decide yet if i should buy a 8 or a 16 voice prophet. So. ” To be clear, I’m not convinced by the claims that this technique makes the Rev 2 “emulate” other synthesizers, and I find all of the wording around that to be pretty cringe. Once you get beyond that, I think the Take 5 sounds better and is easier to use. It has a nice sound, but a limited palette, and that sound leans cheesy and simplistic. For things like James Blake and jazz-voicings, I think you would benefit more from the more modern Rev2 with 16 voices. It's a great controller and doesn't take up much space (37 keys); meanwhile, it's also four-voice para-paraphonic (has per-voice articulation) with stable digital oscillators, making it an Sep 4, 2020 · Versatility: More versatile than the sound of the OB-6's filter, but less versatile than the Rev2's modulation capabilities. It's a sound designer's dream. For using it at a home studio and possible at some gigs. In every case that I would use it, I doubt there would be any noticeable difference. Prophet 6 destroys the Rev 2 and is the best sounding modern analog bar none (that incs the fizzy/harsh OB6, the underwhelming modal 008 and the crappy/plastic/fake sounding Prologue). Agree! I've had the REV2 and now the Prophet 6. 3 has a delay stage and can loop. The OB-6 is much much better sounding than the P6. Second, the Prophet 6 is a stereo-synthesizer. I’m looking for a companion to my Sub37, So I listened to both and i def love the sound of the prophet 6 but at the same time people say it’s limited…. Jul 22, 2022 · Prophet-6 vs Rev2: Which Is Better? The Rev2 can produce the same sounds that the Prophet-6 can, is $1000 cheaper, and wins in terms of functionality, features, LFOs, multiple-step sequencers, and more. they are COMPLETELY DIFFERENT. The Prophet 06 has always felt like a slightly clunky retro synth to me. Unless you like the sound of the prophet 6 a LOT more, and only ever use simple synth patches, I’d say the Rev 2 is the better buy. To my ears the prophet 6 was the clear winner with a huge sweet spot and could get places with the filter wide open that the prophet 5 and rev 2 could not. 2 didn't sound "bigger," even though it has nearly triple the voices—the P6 sounds huge due to its thick VCOs and phat filter. I'm sure the Prophet 6 probably sounds considerably better when soloed in a well tuned studio with solid preamps and AD/DA converters, but considering the synths are going to have effects layered on top and sat in a mix with other instruments and then bounced down to mp3 quality or summed and sent to a FOH that poly unison feature is a godsend - i was a bit bummed about the prophet not being able to get into completely detuned atonal territory like the ob-6 and even the rev2 can with osc slop. The prophet 6 has a different sound to the Rev 2, but it’s subjective which you prefer. Surprisingly, so could the take 5. With the cascade-option you can double the voices from 6 to 12, by daisy-chaining two units. Matriarch isn't my ideal synth for making pads. I also owned a Prologue and it was very nice sonically (sans the inability to have pure analog out even with FX off), less modulation (don't care) but MUCH better tone than the Rev 2, it had even better tone than my old prophet 6, was on par with my OB-6 but didn't beat my Prophet 10 (Rev 4) **FREE Rev2 mutli-samples**https://bit. P12: No sequencer. The 16 voices bi-timbral on the Rev 2 have to be its biggest selling point. Consider the Polybrute too in your search. Less bells and whistles but the sound is first class, as is the build and feel. Though possible you're limited to 4 notes compared to the Rev 2's 8/16 voices. I sold my ob-6/prophet 6 (and rev 2) and now own Prophet 10 rev 4 and I'm done searching! Sequential Prophet Rev-2 (8 voices) with keyboard -- starts at €1500 Native Instruments Komplete Kontrol 61 -- €800 Keyboard. . maybe this can help with that using unison detune. Get some new ears man. Personally, I think the Rev2 is the better synth. Also, the P6 has much wider sweet spot and is far more versatile. 2: 3 envelopes, one freely assignable. There was a lot to like on the REV2, but the filter kinda started to drive me nuts. Reply RufussSewell JP8, 808, OB8, A6, 100m, J60, MS-20M, SH101, Oddy, NL3, S37 • The OB-6 has vintage character in spades. The prophet 12 keyboard has the hands on controls but is big and twice the price (in the current market, for that price range, I'd go for prophet X). First, the Prophet 6 has more voices than the Prophet 5. Great write up. it just felt weak vs the OB-6 and certainly vs the Prophet rev 4. Trigon is interesting. The prophet 12 desktop has digital oscillators, but 4. That can be a deal breaker. Sequencer. Didn't care much for Prophet 6. an option to toggle vintage and osc slop on the prophet would be hectic as well, maybe for a future update - either way looks like if i go the prophet way I tried both at Perfect Circuit in November and wholeheartedly advocate the UDO Super 6. Rev. P12: 4 envelopes, 2 freely assignable. But what this technique does do is make the Rev 2 sound absolutely incredible. I did an excel spreadsheet comparison for 7 poly similar polysynths and it boiled down the the Super 6, Novation Summit, and Prophet Rev2 (eliminated: Jupiter-X, Korg Prologue, Prophet 6, Take-5, Polybrute) Agree, I even said 50% further up before seeing your comment! I've owned P6 and OB-6 (kept OB-6) it sounds much nicer. I have a Prophet 10 rev 4 for my propher sound (which sounds amazing). It is a far more versatile product for sound design, and you can do much more with it. Env. I think one point that would be hard to recreate with the rev2 is the function of the vintage knob on the Prophet 5 (or vintage mode on the Prophet 6 / OB6). Rev 2 sounds terrible, weak filter, harsh, thin, grating the Rev 4 sounds way better than even the Prophet 6 so the rev 2 has no chance. The Prophet 6 again hits a sweet spot that may classify it as the "best all around" of the three synths mentioned here. I need a good (Fatar) synth keybed with 5 octaves and with poly aftertouch -- they both have it. I've owned (in this order) rev 2, Prophet 6, OB-6 and Prophet 10 rev 4. I was shocked at how good it sounded and how easy it was to use. The Matriarch doesn't save presets. The OB-6 on the other hand, was instant love, probably because I like a lot of OB-X stuff. It has a little something that I find missing in most of the other synths out there. All envelopes have delay stages and can loop. Each layer can have a separate sequence. The filters are pretty different, so are the VCOs, of course you have more polyphony with what you have and an extra octave on the keyboard. This is true. But the Rev2 has way more sound design potential, voices, and sounds much more modern. 5 per voice, bitimbral, 4 LFOs & 4 envelopes, but really lacks hands on controls. 2: Up to 64 steps with 6 notes per step. If you're new to synth patching using the Rev 2's presets is a good way to create your own. Oct 5, 2019 · It allows you to pivot to Eurorack, has an excellent built-in sequencer and some great filters (SSM-style like Prophet-6, SEM-style like OB-6). I think the Rev2 and the 6 are similar in the sense both are DSI synths and have a lot of the same feature ideas and onboard effects. Hello guys, i wanna buy my first synthesizer and decided it should be a prophet rev2. It offers stereo panorama spreading of the voices. Again, the Rev 2 sounds great too. qdkt gyrktq ladt tfcaefg mzndw kfpguz intw bivpi pxv shquzxw