Fortigate traffic not hitting policy Interestingly enough, in "Log & Report > Forward Traffic" there are no hits for policy 4. dia ip proute match <destination ip& FortiGate. View the Hit Count, Bytes, Packets, First Used, and Last Used columns. # diagnose sniffer packet any 'host <VirtualIP>' 4 . This might be relevant: I recently changed my FortiGate from standa There is a "policy lookup" feature on the firewall policies screen that lets you put in some details like src/dst ip and the zones and it will tell you what policy it will hit. The output lines show a ping packet being received, a session allocated, a route found and then Hey gurus, kinda new to Fortigate having experience mostly with Palo and Cisco. Traffic Priority: Low Max Bandwidth: 500 kbps Guaranteed Bandwidth: (not enabled) DSCP: (not enabled) I then have a Traffic Shaping Policy as follows: Source: All Destination: All Service: All Outgoing Interface: dmz Shared Shaper: 500kSharedLimit Reverse Shaper: 500kSharedLimit Per-IP Shaper: (not enabled) I have a VPN between a FortiGate VM and 101F. Under Logging Options, Logging FortiGate traffic and using FortiView. This policy says "allow every source, except country-X", resulting in traffic from country-X being denied by the implicit deny policy. 64. Incorrect Firewall Policies. Issue: Traffic is dropped due to misconfigured firewall policies. When Ping from computer with vlan10 I see deny and hit policy 0 in FAZ. 222. Fortianalyzer 1000B with version 4. After changing these settings, the traffic hitting the regular firewall policy will be redirected to the transparent proxy policy. This can be verif the behavior of the outgoing traffic once VIP is created without port forwarding and IP Pool, only enabling the NAT in the policy. 2 19; SSID 19; snmp 18; FortiMonitor 18; OSPF 16; WAN optimization 16; FortiDDoS 15; System settings 15; FortiGate v5. 120. Solution . 0 9; Web rating 9 FortiGate. Case 1: When only a traffic shaping-policy is used. Thus, if your traffic hits policy 0, no policy matched. For non-accelerated traffic, all packets will be counted. Related articles: Technical Note : Configuring a Firewall Policy which is valid only at certain days or hours by using Check Logging Settings: Make sure that the logging settings for your policies are configured to include the Policy ID in the logs. 12/24 Then Action: forward trafic Lets assume there is a WAD debug to be run on a particular source ip/policy. 202 IP towards the internet. 3. 5 DMZ, vlan 33 192. 0 MR3 9; FortiAnalyzer v5. - These policies can include rules for allowing web browsing, email, and other general internet traffic. 133. Both LAN and Management are directly connected routes. Starting in 6. To disable hardware acceleration in an IPv4 firewall policy: When I set a static route for traffic to 10. 255. There should be a firewall-policy Check Which Policy the Traffic hits. Scope FortiGate. The same behavior is observed when the other default objects like schedule and Addresses are modified by the FortiGate Admin. INT - 10Gb interface with a bunch of VLANs WAN - only the Wan1 interface I see traffic hitting the policy, but not returning. It will also show whether SPU is enabled or disabled. Solution: Check and verify whether an active policy is available in the firewall for the destination address. The firewall session shows it is hitting policy 0 for the RDP connection traffic: Session list details with dual traffic shaper. 8) with a fortiextender in WAN port. The prime reason here could be that the implicit deny local in policy is not created. the second webserver is on 200. 15 build1378 (GA) and they are not showing up. Solution: This article describes how to deal with the unexpected behavior of a FortiGate, using an Application control, not being accordingly switched to the Hi @nsharpley . 0 14; FortiSOAR 14; Hi All, As usually I used to see policy ID in fortigate firewall but last few days Policy ID is not showing. 0 9; FortiWeb v5. There is no firewall policy for ipv6 traffic but still the traffic is allowed by This article describes a scenario where policy match lookup is not selecting the correct policy or hit the implicit denied policy. Thnx! User does not match User Host Profile requiring LDAP Group. Test case shows user RDP into window server via SSL VPN web mode successfully. Go to Policy & Objects -> Traffic Shaping -> Traffic Shaping Profiles. When I try to ping from LAN to Management it hits one of the LAN to SD-WAN policies which fails. My 40F is not logging denied traffic. 2 255. A proper route should be configured in FortiGate towards the destination. The problem is that policy-82 never match and traffic apply for policy-29 instead, so users don't need to authenticate to navigate. Edit the policies controlling the traffic you wish to log. 30 to 172. On the second Fortigate (40F/6. The DMZ interface on the 101F has an IP assigned but it's not active (nothing plugged into the port) and that interface is not in the Zone which is Note that in the output in bold above, the FortiGate provides more information about the policy matching process and along with the "Allowed by Policy-XX" output, provides a means for confirming which policies were checked against the corresponding traffic based on matching criteria and which policy was the best match and ended up allowing or denying the traffic. Solution: Policy lookup is a GUI tool used to lookup which policy will be used to allow or deny specific traffic. 2 through the FortiGate unit. However, it is visible from a debug flow that the traffic is matching the implicit deny. It can be tricky if you have other security profiles and you need to know a little about the design like the traffic flow and what zones it's hitting. Or how can. Browse Fortinet Community. SolutionVerify the following:1. Solution Avoid enabling the fetched FSSO Enable Disk logging or set the log location as FortiAnalyzer or the Disk. What is the best practice to check why traffic is not hitting this tunnel or policy? P. 16. Troubleshooting steps: Hello, I have some traffic hitting Implicit Deny, even tho the Allow Policy seems to be correct: Logs: Rule: Found this: Traffic dropped by 'implicit deny pol - Fortinet Community, but everything shown is ok here. Then it should be put in Quarantine for 1 hour. Below are the steps to match the source-ip to a policy to analyze further for that source host. 3[. In cases where a local-in-policy is not working as expected, meaning the traffic that is supposed to be denied are all being sent through. 15 build1378 (GA) Run the debug flow commands to see whether your denied traffic is hitting a firewall policy with a log setting enabled. x branch, as some IKE/ESP gets logged before it gets dropped. 240. S I have access only to my side of tunnel. See link below. It will show Hit Counts, First Hit, Last Hit, and Established Session Count. How can I set that up on a Fortigate (500E)? I am able to quarantine IP's when hitting an APP or IPS policy but just randomly trying only gets dropped. . I 've seen now on 1-to-2 dozen occasions or more, that a firewall engineer stumbles around just to find out a inside interior firewall or router ACL was preventing the traffic destine to the identity-based firewall policies. I have IPv4 policies created to allow all traffic between Management and LAN to be allowed. ScopeVersion: 8. Description: The article describes how to create a FortiAnalyzer report for policy hit count. 1 are from an hour earlier when i In firewall policies try using the policy lookup tool at the top, it should show which policy it is hitting. Solution There are three attributes that can be configured in the SD-WAN service with ISDB: internet-service-custom. Hi all , New to Fortigate, can anyone tell me if you can see what policy a packet hits first ? the firewall im nor managing has ,alot of policies most of them redundant, i would like a sort of sniffer to see what Policy was use to either accept or dent the packet on CLI. If it doesn't hit any it is likely a route missing or confused. - outbound policies need to have NAT enabled (simple NAT to interface address will do). 1/24 I created 2 default gateway for each uplink WAN1 WAN2 I created policy route: protocol ANY INCOMING - INTERNAL NET vlan34 source add - 192. By default, if the intention was to apply Hi! I had several physical interfaces: WAN1 197. Thnx! icmp6-send-redirect is enabled by default and it will redirect the traffic to a more efficient way. 61 WAN2 145. I’ve put some deny rules the firewall and have added some source ips and some destination ips. On the first Fortigate (100D/6. I've checked the logs in the GUI and CLI. 3, we are seeing traffic - randomly - bypassing the policy that should allow it and the hit the implicit deny policy (and get denied) . 0 9; API 9; Port policy 9; Web rating 9; FortiDeceptor 8 The example below will have the same effect as the firewall policy previously mentioned. 101. 6) no traffic is incoming. Method 2: Remove the ZTNA Tag from the firewall policy, enable redirection to the proxy policy, and create a proxy policy. 14. internet-service-name. ScopeAll FortiOS. x. FortiGate. Solution Topology: User Machine <--------> FW <-------> Internet Tested IPs in LAB on version 7. Solution FortiGate CLI allows the verification of the matching policy route to make sure traffic from a specific source to a destination is triggering the correct policy route. When an IPsec VPN tunnel is being established but traffic is not flowing through it, and no changes in FortiGate configuration have been made, then one has to perform packet captures of encapsulating security payload (ESP) packets (i. Regards, Jerry 651 0 Kudos Reply. 2 and above local traffic sent from the fortigate does not follow sdwan rules. In the tree menu for a policy package, select a policy. if it is virtual servers you need to keep the egress interface empty, see from the admin guide: "Note: If you want to control VS traffic through the firewall, you MUST leave the Egress Interface as default (blank). New Contributor In the ASA it is possible to shun an IP when x ammount of policy violations occured. 5939 0 Kudos Reply. When using the policy lookup and entering source and destination IP, it says it matches the implicit deny while there clearly is a policy with both subnets. The Count column and the policy monitors Here’s an overview of common Fortigate Packet Flow troubleshooting issues and steps to resolve them. 5, and I had the same problem under 6. In each VNet’s subnet where traffic originates or terminates, create a UDR that directs traffic to the FortiGate’s internal IP address. Such analysis can give insights into potential threats and help fine-tune policies. Now, I am able to see live Traffic logs in FAZ, ok. This allows VS packets to match the firewall rule. The following policy should allow all traffic from the 100. Guestlan is on a seperate lan. Solution - Make sure to enter the right mac address. 8 still shows the traffic going to the WAN VDOM Reply reply The difference between shaping-policy and firewall-policy implementations of traffic shapers is mentioned in the case-study below. Check the GUI log details This article describes how to troubleshoot issues where traffic does not match any policy although the policy is already created. 200. Verify that policies are correctly configured If the interface is down, associated routes should drop out of the route table and cause traffic to not get matched to a policy and hit the default deny (policy 0). If traffic is NOT hitting your policy, than "Stop" and don't proceed until you ensure that any other network routing or filtering problems has been fixed. To check the hit count for security policy in policy-mode use the below command: diagnose ips pme policy stats . As @jiahoong112 mentioned please verify the configuration of your Virtual IP first and if everything is fine there, you can run a diagnose sniffer command to see if the traffic matching the VIP is entering the firewall or not. SD-WAN rules steers traffic, but traffic must match the rule first. UNAP. 1): As per Fortigate manual for policy routes at minimum Fortigate not showing Deny logs Howdy all, I am trying to view Deny traffic logs on a Fortigate 30E (FortiGate 30Ev6. To confirm the flow, it is possible to use the debug - Clients/users are resolving the av update FQDN to differnt IP from what the FW is resolving the FQDN. So I’m new to firewall management and had a question. While troubleshooting a VPN outage, I noticed in my logs that all of the interesting traffic was being denied - ( Denied by forward policy check (policy 0) Specific traffic from IP A (VLAN X) to IP Z (VLAN Y) hits the firewall. The tool is available under Policy & Objects -> Firewall Policy -> Policy Match The As you can see traffic is hitting policies: Running tracert and continious ping from 192. 0)) and that is filtered by the proxy I want to access. 2, traffic shaping was configured over the firewall policy. My fortigate 100d is not forward traffic between Guestlan and lan. By default, the policy that the traffic goes through has whole subnet/s and debugs on that can show logs from the entire subnet. Even though both routes and policies are verified, there is a chance that the destination interface and ssl. 3 and traffic is going fine. Any supported version of FortiGate. When using FQDN objects in the policy, FW will run DNS queries for the provided FQDN and put the first N IPs from the dns reply (not sure what was the limit if the dns reply multiple ips for single fqdn) and put them in the rule. This might be relevant: I recently changed my FortiGate from standalone to Fabric Root. if asynchronous routing can not be avoided, using policy based routing for the affected traffic is a much cleaner way than enabling it globally. Ex. SELECT policyid, Configuring the FortiGate with an ‘allow all’ traffic policy is very undesirable. The problem is that when I try to match a source network which is not directly connected to the fortigate (comes from a neighbor router) it won't work if I add the group policy property. S II. Solution: In this example, a policy has been created to allow all traffic from port 2 to port 1 Policy from Zone (with vlan10 in it) to VPN tunnel configured, Static Route (with subnet I try to reach, and VPN interface configured) also. Solution: Under Log View -> Reports -> Report Definitions -> Datasets -> Create the following SQL dataset - with Log Type: Traffic - that will be used to generate a report:. Here is the details: CMB-FL01 # show full-configuration log memory filter config log memory filter set severity warning set forward-traffic enable set local Did you configure a firewall policy? Is the traffic hitting the proper firewall policy? Fortigate Cloud 21; Traffic shaping 20; Automation 20; Static route 20; FortiSwitch v6. " Fortigate 200A with version 4. There is no firewall policy for ipv6 traffic but still the traffic is allowed by This article describes the situation when traffic is not matching the policy filtered with the source mac address. We have 3 VDOMs. I need to replace that static route with a policy route, however, due to a conflicting IP range. The only hits for source ip 10. Matching traffic is confirmed through the process outlined in this article. 4. 10. In FortiOS version 5. When configuring an SD-WAN service with an ISDB n Fortigate rules not hitting Hi guys. 0 (MR2 patch 2). When a Security Policy has a different traffic shaper for each direction, it is reflected in the session list output from the CLI: The FortiGate unit is not prioritizing traffic based on the DSCP marking configured in the security policy. Ensure the user record is a LDAP user and not a local record. Next is that your initial screenshot show a different source interface If Maximum Bandwidth is not configured, Guaranteed Bandwidth traffic prioritization will not take the priority. The article sometimes simply refers to SD-WAN rules as 'rules'. Filter the A traffic shaping policy is a rule that matches traffic based on certain IP header fields and/or upper layer criteria. ScopeFortiGate. To allow CLI commands such as the packet sniffer and debug flow to display all traffic matching the policy since traffic offloaded by SPU hardware on a FortiGate device is not visible by those CLI tools. address, service and schedule is followed, all policies below are skipped. 15. Note: For accelerated traffic (ex. In this example, you will configure logging to record information about sessions processed by your FortiGate. If the traffic is not hitting the Firewall, then you need to examine the routing on Policy routes SD-WAN Rules I was assuming traffic would hit that route and then go into the SD-WAN rules find a match and the route through the appropriate interface. 0. Solved! Hello, I have some traffic hitting Implicit Deny, even tho the Allow Policy seems to be correct: Logs: Rule: Found this: Traffic dropped by 'implicit deny pol- Fortinet Community, but everything shown is ok here. From the internet this website is accessable. Normal internet connection is working fine. 6. Regularly I'm having almost the exact same issue in my environment. Use the following command to trace specific traffic on which firewall policy it will be matching: diag firewall iprope lookup <src_ip> <src_port> <dst_ip> <dst_port> <protocol> <Source interface> Example scenario: The FortiGate was configured with 2 specific firewall policies as below: show firewall policy config firewall Change a policy that accepts traffic to one that denies traffic and use the diagnose debug flow commands to view the results. The matching Hello, I have some traffic hitting Implicit Deny, even tho the Allow Policy seems to be correct: Logs: Rule: Found this: Traffic dropped by 'implicit deny pol- Fortinet Community, but everything shown is ok here. It should hit the LAN to Management policy. A tracert to 8. Scope: FortiGate. 0MR2 9; FortiGate v4. Related article: This article describes how to fix an issue on the FortiGate when Application control does not steer the traffic according to sd-wan policy: Scope: FortiGate, SD-WAN, Application control. To do this: Log in to your FortiGate firewall's web interface. IP 1. Scope . 11. The tool is available under Policy & Objects -> Firewall Policy -> Policy Match The icmp6-send-redirect is enabled by default and it will redirect the traffic to a more efficient way. For example, change the policy ID 5 to a DENY, enter the debug flow commands and then ping from 10. If there is no route to the corresponding destination in the routing table, SD-WAN rules will not trigger. 8. However, the firewall policy ID 8 is showing 0 bytes. After configuring our three classes, the The example below will have the same effect as the firewall policy previously mentioned. - To check the mac address on the pc, open the command prompt and enter 'ipconfig/all'. Encrypted traffic cannot be read. Scope: FortiAnalyzer, FortiGate. You can look at local-in-policy for this. 2 and below. First policy matching source interface, destination interface, source address, dest. Could also be nat not working as expected and hence traffic not hitting the sec policy . However, ToS based prioritizing can be made at ingress Check Logging Settings: Make sure that the logging settings for your policies are configured to include the Policy ID in the logs. Beside Policy Hit Count, select Enable. This prevents policy from matching. 6. You will also need minimum certificate inspection, better a deep inspection as FortiGate can only block what it can read. Via the CLI - log severity level set to Warning Local logging . 129 Interface This article describes a scenario where policy match lookup is not selecting the correct policy or hit the implicit denied policy. When traffic hits the firewall, the FortiGate will first look up a firewall policy, and then match a shaping policy. The content pane for the policy is displayed. 0/16, this policy matches when I do a policy lookup. e. Set limit of 300 Mbps on the interface, setup shaper profile with class-id's, assign policies that assign the class-id's, apply policy then bam! - nothing is throttled, hitting speeds of 500+ Mbps, and the interface shows little to no activity via CLI. 181. Traffic shaping policy 10; Intrusion prevention 10; 4. I've had a bug open with TAC regarding this in the past and they declined to fix the logging issue. Select the policy for which you want to see the Policy ID in the logs. Solution. P. Note that logging of this can be a little weird, at least on the 6. config firewall vip <-- below is Added in any_vip Group. 0 (MR2 Patch 2) and . ]4 is gets 5 Policy violations in 60 seconds. I am trying to view Deny traffic logs on a Fortigate 30E (FortiGate 30Ev6. When traffic is initiated from the VM to the 101F, it's traversing the DMZ interface on the 101F. Syntax. For example, if you have VNet1 and VNet2: In VNet1’s route table, add a route for VNet2’s address space with the next hop as Generally "accept" policy 0 is local-in traffic. In some environments, enabling logging on the implicit deny policy which will generate a large volume of logs. We just replaced an ASA with a Fortigate 100f. You will then use FortiView to look at the traffic logs and see the CLI command to verify the matching policy route. However, from my personal experience, source-, destination-, and service-negation are not used much by customers, which is where some of the additional deny-policy usage usually comes from. Solution: In this example, a How can I verify that traffic is being accepted by (or hitting) a security policy? Use the security policy list Count column and the policy monitors. Description This article explains about reply traffic which is not matching any of the configured policy routes or SD-WAN rules. root interfaces are configured in different This article describes how to troubleshoot when traffic does not match SD-WAN rules. 1) Create a new policy and place it at top - policies are checked from top to bottom. 0 MR3 9; FortiWeb v5. The debug output shows that traffic is not hitting the correct policy (Policy ID 13). When I remove the Static Route, it does no longer match (as expected). Scope: FortiGate v7. Anyone have any Idea on this. By default, FortiGate will not generate the logs for denied traffic in order to optimize logging resource usage. Navigate to "Policy & Objects" > "IPv4 Policy" (or "IPv6 Policy" if applicable). why the traffic didn't hit the specific SD-WAN rule with ISDB. 1. 1/24 INTERNAL NET, vlan 34,35 192. Scope FortiGate. Sozo_Admin. This rule acts as a safety net to prevent any unintended or unmanaged traffic from passing through. This is a real case where, after FortiGate HA failed over, the setup that previously worked has stopped working. The route is available and the policy hit (action allow) is as expected, but no traffic leaves the FortiGate. 9: Server IP: 10. One webserver is on 200. Next is that your initial screenshot show a different source interface (port1 vs port2). Solution When initiate a traffic from Internet to the LAN segment is initiate (behind FGT), the traffic enters through one interface and it is possible to observe the reply traffic going out of a different interface than the original incoming interface (if This article describes how to troubleshoot issues where traffic does not match any policy although the policy is already created. If it worked, then check the This article describes that policy routes will not work for FortiGate-initiated traffic. Stay Updated: Security is a dynamic field. To view policy hit counts: Ensure you are in the correct ADOM. This article describes how to solve an issue where VIP traffic does not match a firewall policy with the destination set to 'all'. It is important to check the default objects used in that policy have not been modified. ) Send the traffic to the non-functioning app or website. 168. I've checked the "log violation traffic" on the implicit deny policy in both the GUI and CLI and it is on (which I believe should be the default anyway). internet-service-app-ctrl. The VPN tunnel was created using the IPSec Wizard. Refer to the following document for more information: Seven-day policy hit counter . NP2 ports), only the start of the session packet will be counted, and this counter does therefore not reflect the real traffic count. Unlike ipv4 In the ASA it is possible to shun an IP when x ammount of policy violations occured. Deny All Policy: - At the very bottom of your policy list, a "Deny All" rule that blocks all traffic not explicitly allowed. Traffic shaping policy 10; Port policy 10; Intrusion prevention 10; 4. 8 to 6. While this does greatly simplify the configuration, it is less secure. Solution: Policy routes are designed for forwarding traffic not for local out After updating firmware on our 600D, from 6. 101 IP on Port3, traffic is forwarding via WAN2 (Nex hop 65. Wan adresses are 200. (It is possible to capture the packet capture with memory for lower amounts of traffic. In lieu of manual local-in policies where the feature has been enabled and policies defined, local-in policies are built dynamically from the configuration of upstream services ie management interface config, service config etc. Solution: Occasionally when creating a firewall policy from 'WAN' Hello, I have some traffic hitting Implicit Deny, even tho the Allow Policy seems to be correct: Logs: Rule: Found this: Traffic dropped by 'implicit deny pol- Fortinet Community, but everything shown is ok here. Now, I have enabled on all policy's. Solution: To make sure SD-WAN rules work, there must be a route in the routing table for that destination. There is a firewall policy with the below config: From Internal To: VPN INTERFACE Source: ALL destination: ALL sa=1 indicates IPsec SA is matching and there is traffic between the selectors c) sa=2 is only visible I'm pretty sure u/pabechan is correct that this is local traffic, so your security policy won't get hit. From the internet as from the guestnetwerk. One of the possible reasons is that the fetched FSSO groups on FortiGate have been enabled directly on the firewall policy. It is possible to enable the ‘Log IPv4 Violation Traffic’ under ‘implicit deny policy’. FortiGate Traffic/Event logs, or similar tools. 100. For example: We have a setup with a Fortigate 60F (7. Firmware is 6. There was "Log Allowed Traffic" box checked on few Firewall Policy's. I don't understand why its hitting a LAN to SD-WAN policy. - Go to Policy&Objects -> Addresses and check the mac address. Note that SDWAN rules are 'policy routes', but regular policy routes have precedence over SD-WAN rules. It is possible to verify from the forward traffic logs. Sorry guys, i've did a quick test with a local squid server as forwarding endpoint and that works flawless! The problem seems that the fortigate sends https traffic to the proxy with its own useragent (FortiGate (FortiOS 7. To troubleshoot any possible issues arising by using hardware acceleration. Admin Users UI Method: User account has Auth Type = LDAP. Policy from Zone (with vlan10 in it) to VPN tunnel configured, Static Route (with subnet I try to reach, and VPN interface configured) also. The ICMPV6 traffic thus does not pass through FortiGate nor match policy6. 10/24 dest add - 192. This means that traffic did not hit ANY policy but policy #0 ("implicit deny") and thus got denied. Solution: After being connected to SSL VPN web mode, there is no traffic hitting the policy and it is showing 0 bytes. Remembers that local Fortigate traffic uses the kernel routing by default, not SDWAN. 2. Go to Policy & Objects > Policy Package. encrypted packets) between the This article explains how to apply traffic-shaping in a firewall policy. In this case, the traffic shaper is defined only under the traffic shaping-policy and not defined under firewall-policy. From 'ZTNA Traffic' logs under 'Log & Report', an entry will be recorded that policy traffic was allowed and proxy policy matched. Method Go to Policy & Objects > IPv4 Policy. 20. 3) I can ping behind it and it shows me traffic flowing into the tunnel as allowed by policy. If the 'Service' named 'ALL' is not configured to allow traffic for all ports, traffic will be dropped by hitting deny policy id-0. that FSSO user traffic is blocked when 'Collector Agent' is enabled as a user group source in the FSSO setting. pskeht ckdpfk whczv wxouvl bll libvm kdsbn hcntzbz uqlv gshz fmmdy npasb hkacyp gnodz kquslfr